01-09-2005, 11:35 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 634
| Infighting is a nice way to say "bad distance"- agree or disagree? I can't remember where I've heard that before, but for some reason it just came to mind. I suppose this one is mostly for foilists and epeeists, since I haven't seen any DECENT sabre fencers ever infight.
I'm sort of half and half on this topic. I realize full well that there are some situations where you just don't have a choice, but I've also seen people who can't do jack from a normal distance, but once you get within a certain reach, they'll run at you, stop, and try to do that irritating over/behind the head thrust/flick. Sometimes you get stuck and you CAN'T get out of it without sacrificing the touch, but the people like the ones I described makes me want to say it's true.
What about you? Legit techniques, or people not wanting to admit that their distance is bad?
__________________ Out Of The Ashes |
| | | And now for this message... | |
01-09-2005, 11:42 PM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 42
| i wouldn't say it's bad distance. alot of people are naturally good infighters, or they practice it often, and employ it against opponents who may have difficulties fencing at such a restricted range. |
| |
01-09-2005, 11:45 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: ---->
Posts: 2,124
| In epee, at least, you're going to wind up in an infighting situation often enough. Lots of reasons for it. It's not always because of a mistake or bad distance control. Often as not, it's just the result of the way your strategy and the other guy's strategy combined. And it is sometimes done on purpose, especially when one fencer realizes the other's not so good at infighting.
It's not pretty. It usually looks awkward or sloppy. But an epee fencer who lacks infighting skills is an incomplete fencer.
__________________
Just because you have the right, that doesn't mean it is right.
|
| |
01-09-2005, 11:46 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: UK
Posts: 753
| Some people might think it's a nice way to say "brawl" though, but I'm not sure. There seems to be a specific technique to infighting, at least in modern fencing. Another tactical option perhaps. |
| |
01-09-2005, 11:48 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,459
| It's not always bad distance. I have purposely forced infighting positions before in bouts, and not because I have bad distance. If someone is much taller than you, for example, infighting is not a bad idea.
But how exactly do you define "infighting"? Is it the distance where you're basically touching your opponent, and you can only hit with a prime (or, now, turned shoulders)? Or is it the distance where you both SHOULD have hit at some point, and are now within extension range? |
| |
01-10-2005, 12:55 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 253
| Welted, if someone can score enough touches on you by closing distance and then infighting that you see it as worth complaining about, then that person is showing a certain degree of control of distance. |
| |
01-10-2005, 01:12 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 634
| Actually, what I meant was that they just can't do anything other than that. I haven't actually fenced them since I ditched foil, but I've seen people who do that and their technique sucks other than that. It's like all they ever do is practice that and nothing else.
__________________ Out Of The Ashes |
| |
01-10-2005, 02:42 AM
|
#8 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 38
| if a guy is signifigantly taller than you, infighting is the best way to get them. If you can initiate an infighting situation on demand, you have GREAT distance. if you do it by accident, you have crappy distance. |
| |
01-10-2005, 05:42 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Wokingham, United Kingdom
Posts: 581
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Welted 24/7 What about you? Legit techniques, or people not wanting to admit that their distance is bad? | I love fencing in close-quarters, because invariably I tend to get the hit. You're right in that it concerns distance, but it does not necessarily mean bad distance from either fencer. A lot of my hits tend to be in close as a result of hitting with second intention, mostily with remise and redouble (after a flêche, for example).
If you're not so comfortable with infighting, then you really need to be... but until then, if you're fencing somebody that is comfortable with it, my advice would be to keep your distance as best you can and stay sharp. Distance is the best defense!
Good luck!  |
| |
01-10-2005, 06:17 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GREECE/Piraeus
Posts: 1,310
| Look. At the start I have had the same promblem with you. When you come in this situation the best that you can do is to RUN forward left (if you are right hand) and pass off your oponent. You cannot touch you if you run fast, dont worry about that. Now the other that I can say is the following. Try to not come in this situation. When your oponent press you with a lung, you must fall back and parry then ripost him quickly, now if you can break his tempo that will be nice (if you are an epee player try a quick contra attack without ofcourse fall back and the touch is yours.)
__________________
The purpose of tactic is to conquer the enemy with proper war movements and actions.
-Tactics of Emperor Leon 6th the Wise
|
| |
01-10-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004 Location: U.S. of F-ing A.
Posts: 1,926
| bad distance?!?!  methinks not!
Infighting for me is extremely useful for when I KNOW the other guy sucks at it. I have a mean flechime (fleche and prime rolled into one crunchy ball of goodness).
__________________
thetheory.tk
|
| |
01-10-2005, 11:43 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 129
| good for shorter fencers .....
Last edited by germanguy; 01-02-2007 at 01:56 PM.
|
| |
01-10-2005, 12:18 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 219
| I think it's fun
But there's only one person I ever really wind up infighting with at my club, and generally only on the new timing  I don't know. |
| |
01-10-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,459
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by HillBilly bad distance?!?!  methinks not!
Infighting for me is extremely useful for when I KNOW the other guy sucks at it. I have a mean flechime (fleche and prime rolled into one crunchy ball of goodness). | Wow, I didn't know anyone else did that. I find it to be very effective against lefties who keep their bellguard against their chest.
VELISARIOS, if they are an experienced fencer, they will hit you when you run past. |
| |
01-10-2005, 02:22 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: In mid lunge
Posts: 804
| Foil infighting offers some remarkable demonstrations of human athleticism and elasticity... especially if you're tall.
__________________ Heaven is where the police are British, the chefs Italian, the mechanics are German, the lovers are French, and its all organized by the Swiss. Hell is where the police are German, the chefs are British, the mechanics are French, the lovers are Swiss, and it's all organized by the Italians. "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered" George Best |
| |
01-10-2005, 06:44 PM
|
#16 | | Boom!
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 5,925
| I find that if I've ever closed to infighting, I usually get the hit. I don't particularly try to close distance, but it does seem to work against tall skinny people with long limbs. |
| |
01-10-2005, 06:58 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 182
| <Donning flame retardant suit>
I had an old school Russian coach one time (old as in the bad old days) giving an epee infighting lesson to one of my friends. The coach stood chest to chest with my friend and said "When stand here, where you touch?" After about 15 seconds of my friend trying various contortions with his arm, trying to get his point on the coach, the coach says "NO! Hit here!" and jabs his own toe, saying "Always know where own foot is!" Kind of an entertaining lesson!
<Doffing flame retardant suit>
I've always acknowledged when I hit myself in competition bouts, and the ref has always properly discounted my touches.
Interesting side note: George K was giving a reffing clinic and mentioned that the real reason for disallowing turning of the back is not for safety. Safety would prevent turning of the HEAD which is still perfectly legal under the rules. The reason is because epee fencers would take prime and close distance, and clip their own thigh on the riposte. Heck, when the fencers are that bound up it gets difficult for the ref to see exactly where the hit occurs. Infighting can get really messy, especially in epee.
Aaron |
| |
01-10-2005, 07:07 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 182
| I love to have a good infight. (is that proper english?!?) My favorite action is probably a big sweep 2, then step forward with the back foot, reverse the shoulders, and jab for the gut. My (other) Russian coach would describe the hit with: "Is like knife, like knife!" for the short thrust at the end. Lots of fun to hit with this one.
Infighting for me is just another aspect of fencing. If I can get away with simple actions at long distance, I prefer that. Sometimes you have to crunch the distance to get the touch. If I'm better at infighting, I will. Sometimes the other fencer reacts unexpectadely and the distance gets crunched. If you know how to shorten that 35" of epee or foil down to something manageable, it increases your chances of getting a touch at very close distance. |
| |
01-10-2005, 07:45 PM
|
#19 | | Fencing Expert
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: greece
Posts: 3,362
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Welted 24/7 Actually, what I meant was that they just can't do anything other than that. I haven't actually fenced them since I ditched foil, but I've seen people who do that and their technique sucks other than that. It's like all they ever do is practice that and nothing else. | But isn't that true with every technique? We've all seen fencers who can only flick, and only practices to flick. That's just one example. In epee, you see the guys who practice only foot touches, or who only rely on counters...
It doesn't mean the technique itself is bad, just that the fencer is limited.
Infighting is a very important technique that every foil and epee fencer needs to practice.
__________________ We're no threat, people, we're not dirty, we're not mean
We love everybody but we do as we please
When the weather's fine,
We go fishin' or go swimmin' in the sea
We're always happy
Life's for livin', yeah, that's our philosophy |
| |
01-11-2005, 04:26 AM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: St Kilda, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 605
| What Ach said, infighting is a part of fencing for both foil and epee, that means if you're good at it then it's an advantage over people who aren't good at it. The question of "is it good technique?" is like asking "is the lunge good technique?"
__________________ I'm so cool; put me in a fridge and it gets colder!
I'm Australian and that makes me MANLY! |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM. |