topleft topright

View Poll Results: New sub-forum?

Voters
35. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    12 34.29%
  • No

    23 65.71%
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36

Thread: New Sub-forum?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939

    New Sub-forum?

    It has recently come to my attention that several Board elders have become annoyed by the seeming "immaturity" of the board of late. I have a proposition that may seem inane, or just plain nonsense. Would the majority of the forum like to see a new sub-forum ONLY for blithering nonsense like we have seen of late? If not, please state your case.

    Thank you,
    Hillbilly
    thetheory.tk

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array npkeith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Redlands, CA
    Posts
    277
    You didn't give an option for "maybe." It depends on how things are run. Also, what is your definition of "Blithering nonsense?"
    Chiswick, fresh horses! We ride at once to rebellious Stoke where it is my sworn intent to approach the city walls, bare my broad buttocks, and shout "Behold! I honor thee most highly!"

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939
    Quote Originally Posted by npkeith
    Also, what is your definition of "Blithering nonsense?"
    Well, apparently several elders have complained at our conversations about such things as sex; see Moonitics thread: http://www.fencing101.com/vb/showthread.php?t=14657

    Quote Originally Posted by npkeith
    It depends on how things are run
    I assume Craig will pick the moderator of this new sub-forum, if the sub-forum indeed comes about.

    and I purposely. left the option for maybe a blank; I figure this will make the denizens of Fencing.net choose one option or the other, instead of "when in doubt, hit maybe."
    thetheory.tk

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array D+F+P=Hadouken!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5,725
    Quote Originally Posted by HillBilly
    Well, apparently several elders have complained at our conversations about such things as sex; see Moonitics thread: http://www.fencing101.com/vb/showthread.php?t=14657



    I assume Craig will pick the moderator of this new sub-forum, if the sub-forum indeed comes about.

    and I purposely. left the option for maybe a blank; I figure this will make the denizens of Fencing.net choose one option or the other, instead of "when in doubt, hit maybe."
    hey, if its a forum for blithering nonsense, we need someone to keep dull, sensible topics out, therefore, the new moderator needs to be IMMATURE!
    "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. And from this side only! The flight of a half-man, half-bird. Dinosaurs nuzzling their young in pastures where strip malls should be. Cookies on dowels. All those moment, lost in time. Gone, like eggs off a hooker's stomach. Time to die" -Phil Ken Sebben

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939
    Quote Originally Posted by D+F+P=Hadouken!
    hey, if its a forum for blithering nonsense, we need someone to keep dull, sensible topics out, therefore, the new moderator needs to be IMMATURE!
    Perhaps, however, I presume we will need someone to moderate who abides to the rules of the Forum in general. If we have an immature forum moderator, I highly doubt Craig will let the forum get off the ground.
    thetheory.tk

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939
    An example of those putting up a protest:

    Quote Originally Posted by iwant2bafencer
    It is unfortunate, that the types of threads showing up in the Water Cooler are even being thought up.
    It has been discussed between a few of us and I believe the rest of you will agree.
    Anything rude, vulgar, disrespectful, or anything that falls along those lines posted in Fantasyland should be immediately deleted or locked.

    We've been writing here for years and I'll be hell fire and brimstoned if I'm going to sit back and watch it disappear under disrespectful issues that should not be breached on a family type, respectable forum.

    Craig has done a great job of keeping this whole site up and running and keeping its nose as clean as he can and I think it's the least we can do to help out in that effort.

    I have some form of respect for every writer here and I should hope the same is passed between each of you, enough so that we wont resort to stupid, frivilous matters.
    Some of those who replied:

    Quote Originally Posted by Darion Mcnair
    Now you know why I hardly ever post of the Water Cooler
    Quote Originally Posted by Moonitic
    As one of the moderators of Fantasy Land, I will support what Rosieposie (aka "Iwant2bafencer") has to say. There are plenty of other sites for nasty writing. This isn't one of them.
    The thread:
    http://www.fencing101.com/vb/showthread.php?t=14656

    I believe this new sub-forum will keep the "nasty writing" into one consilidated place. Craig can even put a "Warning: content not G-rated" on the title if he wants.
    thetheory.tk

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array Prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    299
    This is a discussion group for fencing.

    There is already a folder for off topic posts.

    There is no reason to have an "uncensored" or "age restricted" area on a fencing discussion board. No one is obligated to post messages. Perhaps if what you have to say is “Blithering nonsense” there is no need to share it with everyone.

    Creating a folder for topics not mature enough for the off topic area or too vulgar for the off topic area essentially sanctions the actions of people that act that way. If folks want to sit around and post garbage there are plenty of other forums on the internet in which to do so.

    As someone else pointed out in another thread, if the content of this site becomes explicit it will start to trip firewalls and cause some of us to loose access from some work and school based networks.

    For quite some time, we have not had a problem with the basic TOS rules or the culture of the forum. I don’t think the established standard is too much to ask.

  8. #8
    Fencing Expert Array achilleus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    greece
    Posts
    3,379
    I vote no. People make up the discussion, not the title of the folder.

    The guidelines aren't impossible to follow, and Craig and the mods do a great job of keeping order.
    We're no threat, people, we're not dirty, we're not mean
    We love everybody but we do as we please
    When the weather's fine,
    We go fishin' or go swimmin' in the sea
    We're always happy
    Life's for livin', yeah, that's our philosophy

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array Moonitic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Prometheus
    This is a discussion group for fencing.

    There is already a folder for off topic posts.

    There is no reason to have an "uncensored" or "age restricted" area on a fencing discussion board. No one is obligated to post messages. Perhaps if what you have to say is “Blithering nonsense” there is no need to share it with everyone.

    Creating a folder for topics not mature enough for the off topic area or too vulgar for the off topic area essentially sanctions the actions of people that act that way. If folks want to sit around and post garbage there are plenty of other forums on the internet in which to do so.

    As someone else pointed out in another thread, if the content of this site becomes explicit it will start to trip firewalls and cause some of us to loose access from some work and school based networks.

    For quite some time, we have not had a problem with the basic TOS rules or the culture of the forum. I don’t think the established standard is too much to ask.
    THANK YOU.

    If someone really has a problem with having rules & standards, & abiding by them, perhaps they can create their own board, to talk about whatever they want.
    "Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind."

    -- Rudyard Kipling

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939
    I have no problem with the current system. However, I for one will not change from my current voice in the Water Cooler. If you people are prepared to put up with the "nasty writing," that has been going on, then no sweat.
    thetheory.tk

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array Sarah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    1,523
    This seriously is a silly idea. Yes, there are immature people and yes, there are mature people. And yes, mature people get immature and immature people get mature. It is all apart of life. There are things that everyone learns to deal with. I for one have learned that a lot of my views are not shared with my fellow teens, but I don't let it bother me. Unfortunately, there will always be someone who doesn't toe the line, but that's ok. Just as long as they don't get out of hand. This isn't a porn site, which everyone knows, so I think that we have nothing to worry about. People change, and one day the 'blatherers of nonsense' will be complaining of the same thing.
    Proditio plerumque amatur, proditor odio habetur.
    -Plutarch

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array Soldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,159
    My concern: Who is to decide what is a good topic, and what is pointless/inane/inappropriate? I'll grant that some things are clearly inappropriate. In that case, why keep them around at all?

    As for pointless/immature/inane...what would you be left with without them? A poll about evolution and some poems?
    There are no damn chickens in my room!
    "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

  13. #13
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    I think it is unnecessary. I hve forwarded Hillibily's request to craig already. It's really up to Craig whether he thinks it's a good idea or no.

    Personally, I think that this board is one of the better ones that I frequent and I do not want to see any "FencingSucks" type activity on it.

  14. #14
    ಠ_ಠ Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5,958
    Blog Entries
    25
    this would change nothing
    my "new posts" link would still be spammed with the same old stuff

    a vote of "no" and "grow up a little bit, you don't all have to be gigantic idiots to have fun"

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array HillBilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    U.S. of F-ing A.
    Posts
    1,939
    Quote Originally Posted by noodle
    this would change nothing
    my "new posts" link would still be spammed with the same old stuff

    a vote of "no" and "grow up a little bit, you don't all have to be gigantic idiots to have fun"
    Ah, but you see, this won't happen.
    thetheory.tk

  16. #16
    Senior Member Array Black Jeebus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Savannah, Ga
    Posts
    6,146
    Quote Originally Posted by HillBilly
    Ah, but you see, this won't happen.
    I agree which is why I think sectioning off (ie quarintining) certain posts is a decent idea. Maybe if the people posting those "immature" (read often moronic) posts realize that it's only ever the same people responding to it or viewing it, they will realize that most of what they are writing is more fitting for a PM.

    I just don't trust in the ability of people to grow up- not when most of the culprits have just begun to move out of the phase of childish innocence into the phase of immaturity that so annoys the rest of the world.

    Mostly, and I feel like an *** for saying this, but to me this seems like a measure to isolate the self-titled "Brat Pack", which really doesn't irk me at all.

    Being a teen is something that you have to go through, but when you realize that what you are doing specifically annoys a group of people (people who's community you have joined) you should try to curb some of those tendencies.

    EDIT: The actions I'm talking about are frequent postings which annoy mass groups of forumites.
    Last edited by Black Jeebus; 12-12-2004 at 06:06 AM. Reason: Clarification
    Hello.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,746
    If you want your own forum/chatroom, discover the wonders of IRC and leave well enough alone.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    8,106
    Quote Originally Posted by HillBilly
    It has recently come to my attention that several Board elders have become annoyed by the seeming "immaturity" of the board of late. I have a proposition that may seem inane, or just plain nonsense. Would the majority of the forum like to see a new sub-forum ONLY for blithering nonsense like we have seen of late? If not, please state your case.

    Thank you,
    Hillbilly
    We already have one. It's called the "Water Cooler." No one is forcing anyone to read threads, or to respond to them.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Array Kismet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    495
    This is where I stand on the issue, after some contemplation. F101 has more than one forum. There is more than one place to talk and act serious (Fencing Discussion and the Armoury). But to me, the Water Cooler is a place to kick back, relax, have fun, and be ourselves. If you don't like some of what is being said, that's fine, and I respect your opinion on that. But nobody is forcing you to read (or even open) a thread that you do not like. That's why there are titles for threads, and if you hold your mouse over it, a box pops up with the first few words. If you don't like those, then don't open it. Easy solution, really. I think if everybody around here respected eachother and respected our different ages and maturity levels, there wouldn't be as much of a problem. Anyway, I am blabbing on here and probably repeating myself, so I will go.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Array Westley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    None of your Damn buisiness! Or California.
    Posts
    2,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Kismet
    This is where I stand on the issue, after some contemplation. F101 has more than one forum. There is more than one place to talk and act serious (Fencing Discussion and the Armoury). But to me, the Water Cooler is a place to kick back, relax, have fun, and be ourselves. If you don't like some of what is being said, that's fine, and I respect your opinion on that. But nobody is forcing you to read (or even open) a thread that you do not like. That's why there are titles for threads, and if you hold your mouse over it, a box pops up with the first few words. If you don't like those, then don't open it. Easy solution, really. I think if everybody around here respected eachother and respected our different ages and maturity levels, there wouldn't be as much of a problem. Anyway, I am blabbing on here and probably repeating myself, so I will go.
    Totally agree. And Telkanru made a decent poll as well. I'd love to see the new forum happen, but I don't think it'd really matter much either way. I voted yes, but really, whatever happens works for me.
    I'm not Random. I'm Abstract.
    http://www.fencing.net/forums/thread...tml#post560736
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ivu5fLWBpc
    Neinteen, will you go flirtying with me or if u do allow u kick my ass.

Similar Threads

  1. Parallel forum discussion page?
    By edew in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-14-2003, 11:00 AM
  2. Relationship between rsf and this forum?
    By PeterGustafsson in forum Water Cooler
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-02-2002, 05:48 PM
  3. Dumbest person in this forum poll
    By Sergei in forum Discussion Archive
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-02-2001, 05:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30