topleft topright

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467

    Guide to Politcal discourse - Arguments, Rhetoric and Logic

    Well if the Politics area is going to stay here then we all mind as well have a listing of the latin that Inq keeps bringing up...

    http://www2.sjsu.edu/depts/itl/graphics/main.html

    The arguments in here have, by and large, been extremely intelligent and fruitful. Yeah, we may disagree passionately, but at least we disagree intelligently. So, take a look, learn to argue and persuade, and no AD HOMINEM!

    Maybe Craig can make this a sticky if the Politics area is going to stick around???
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,746
    Good stuff. We can use it a priori
    The only way to atone for being occasionally a little over-dressed is by being always absolutely over-educated. -Oscar Wilde

  3. #3
    Senior Member Array jeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    It's a dry heat
    Posts
    6,686
    Great link, jBirch. Only thing missing in Appeals section is "Appeals to Bout Committee"!
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different."

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    Here's another one for fun. This one is about Rhetoric more then Logic.

    http://www.virtualsalt.com/rhetoric.htm
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array ls14evar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Chicago-land
    Posts
    228
    Interesting link, but since when has logic had ANYTHING to do with politics.
    "I live my life a bout at a time. Nothing else matters. Not the mortgage, not the store, not my team and all their bulls***. For those 15 touches or less, I am free."

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array Artisan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Mid Atlantic
    Posts
    1,227
    Then this link has more to do with political discourse:
    Thirty-eight dishonest tricks which are commonly used in argument, with the methods of overcoming them

    http://www.246.dk/38tricks.html

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array lochinvar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    Posts
    3,001
    Quote Originally Posted by telkanuru
    Good stuff. We can use it a priori
    That's a non sequitur...
    Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action.

  8. #8
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,800
    This logic stuff will never catch on.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array lochinvar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    Posts
    3,001
    You only say that 'cause yer a Commie pinko...
    Nothing is more frightening than ignorance in action.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    8,106
    How about a list of Latin phrases, and how you can translate them literally, so as to distort their meaning?

    Actually, most Latin phrases work pretty well:

    Ad nauseum
    Tu quoque

    Some don't:

    "That was a clear to man attack, Inquartata!"

  11. #11
    Curmudgeon Emeritus Array Inquartata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in your nightmares!
    Posts
    33,800
    Quote Originally Posted by lochinvar
    You only say that 'cause yer a Commie pinko...
    Nay, I'm a Red herring. ( And no, you may not cut down the mightiest tree in the forest with me. )

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    *Baba bump*
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array jBirch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Carstairs, AB, Canada
    Posts
    3,467
    Inq is practicing obfuscation again...*bump*
    If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.

  14. #14
    pkt
    pkt is offline
    Senior Member Array pkt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, the WET coast of Canada
    Posts
    1,979
    Et tu, Brutus?

    Mater dio.

    PK

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,746
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbiggs
    How about a list of Latin phrases, and how you can translate them literally, so as to distort their meaning?

    Actually, most Latin phrases work pretty well:

    Ad nauseum
    Tu quoque

    Some don't:

    "That was a clear to man attack, Inquartata!"
    Some basics

    a priori- lit. 'from the previous'. A peice of an argument that can be assumed because it has already been proven

    cum hoc ergo propter hoc- lit. 'with this therefore because of this'. A common logical fallacy of saying corrilation means causation

    O tempora! O mores!- lit. 'O the times! O the habits!'. Basically, What's the world coming to. Rhetoric, by M.T. Cicero.

    Ad hominem- lit. 'to the man'. An attack on the person rather than the argument

    quod erat demonstratum- lit. 'with respect to which it was demonstrated'. More commonly, 'thus, I prove'. Abbr.- QED.

    sic- lit. 'thus'. Placed next to a misspelling/inaccuracy in the original to note the error is known but part of the original.

    ergo- lit. 'therefore'. No further explaination required.

    Erratus humanus est- lit. 'to err is human'. Keep this in mind when you find fault with this post.

    More as I think of them.
    The only way to atone for being occasionally a little over-dressed is by being always absolutely over-educated. -Oscar Wilde

  16. #16
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    Why not avoid Latin and make your posts in plain English - with good spelling, good grammar and sensible sentence structure.

    Just a thought.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,746
    Tradition and the elevation of the discussion to a more academic level. Also, if I couldn't use Latin, I would have wasted 4 hours a week for 3 years taking it!
    The only way to atone for being occasionally a little over-dressed is by being always absolutely over-educated. -Oscar Wilde

  18. #18
    Senior Member Array Epictetus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    St. Mary's College of Maryland
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by telkanuru
    cum hoc ergo propter hoc- lit. 'with this therefore because of this'. A common logical fallacy of saying corrilation means causation
    I thought it was post hoc ergo propter hoc?
    Hateful to me as the gates of Hades is that man who hides one thing in his heart and speaks another. ~Homer

    Student St. Mary's College of Maryland

    Philosophy Major: Will think for food.

  19. #19
    Gav
    Gav is online now
    Moderator Array Gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    6,559
    I disagree. Using latin doesn't raise the discussion to any level at all. Tradition yes, making you look like a smarty pants yes - raising the discussion level ... no. I understand a bit of Latin (I had to learn a bit when I was stdying Biology) but would much rather people typed proper sentences, checked their spelling (even if they have used a spellchecker) and used proper grammar. I suppose that would be too much to ask these days... (I'm not even 30 yet I sound like an OAP).

    I understand you wanting to use it after 4 years of it.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Array telkanuru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    7,746
    Quote Originally Posted by Epictetus
    I thought it was post hoc ergo propter hoc?
    Either technically work.

    'After this therefore because of this' and 'with this therefore because of this'.

    You do, however, cite the more commonly used version.
    The only way to atone for being occasionally a little over-dressed is by being always absolutely over-educated. -Oscar Wilde

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30