09-27-2004, 10:21 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| Weekly Trivia Question #4 1. There is a function (for example, f(x) = x), that will, when graphed, give an x and y axis (A vertical plus sign +) , intersecting at a point (p,q). Find the general form of this function. (In simplest form)
2. Who is responsible for my signature quote? ("Common sense is not so common")
3. What is the heat given off by black holes called?
4. When was the White House burned down? (<---easy one)
If I owe you rep points, tell me. Sorry there's only 4 this week.
Good luck.  |
| | | And now for this message... | |
09-27-2004, 10:22 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,371
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs 3. What is the heat given off by black holes called?
Good luck.  | would that be the x-ray emissions. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:24 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| No, specifically. And I beleive that there's more than X-rays, anyway, but I'm not positive. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:29 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,371
| ah well if you won't give me x-rays I'll take 1812 as the burning down of the white house
Sorry war of 1812 but burnt down in 1814
Last edited by keith; 09-27-2004 at 10:35 PM.
|
| |
09-27-2004, 10:37 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| OK, you got it.
1 down, 3 to go. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:41 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,091
| You've got to clarify the math question; it doesn't quite make sense. Do you mean two lines parallel to the axes, and intersecting at (p,q)? |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:42 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| yes, two lines with one function.
Sorry, I realize that it was unclear. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:46 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,091
| Number one is a trick question. Part of deciding if something is a function is called the "vertical line test", which this by definition fails. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:46 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,091
| And, by the way, you owe me two reps from last round. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:50 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| Ignore the vertical line test.
This isn't a "function", but express it as such.
And it breaks another rule of math, but you'll have to figure that out. |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:53 PM
|
#11 | | No, your mom's a lemur
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: None of your Damn buisiness! Or California.
Posts: 2,832
| Voltaire, and if soldier is wrong, y=mx+b. Also, black holes expel turbulent friction, which is picked up on x-rays and UV Rays
Last edited by Westley; 09-27-2004 at 10:58 PM.
|
| |
09-27-2004, 10:58 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 270
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Soldier Number one is a trick question. Part of deciding if something is a function is called the "vertical line test", which this by definition fails. | t(x)={0 when t=0, t when t!=0)
t(y)={0 when t!=0, t when t=0)
3 is hawking radiation |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:58 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| Voltaire is indeed correct.
f(x) = px + q, which is what I assume you meant, isn't.  |
| |
09-27-2004, 10:59 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| Hawking radiation it is.
It's a single function, not piecewise. |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:01 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 270
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs Hawking radiation it is.
It's a single function, not piecewise. | Piecewise is a single function!
However, is it parametric? |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:01 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| I can't remember that term, what's parametric? |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:03 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 270
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by mrbiggs I can't remember that term, what's parametric? | Its when you express x and y as functions of a 3rd term, usually t. |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:03 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: MA
Posts: 7,519
| oh, yes.
No, it is not. It can be expressed as f(x) = ... |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:04 PM
|
#19 | | No, your mom's a lemur
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: None of your Damn buisiness! Or California.
Posts: 2,832
| I didn't pay attention the 1st time. f(x)=x shows the Inverse property of multiplication, therefore, it is an inverse function. |
| |
09-27-2004, 11:06 PM
|
#20 | | No, your mom's a lemur
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: None of your Damn buisiness! Or California.
Posts: 2,832
| Unless it's an identical function. I always got those two mixed up. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM. |