08-06-2004, 03:21 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Australia
Posts: 39
| 350N v 1600N Hi,
I have had a cornea trasnplant in my eye and so am very interested about what masks will give the utmost protection. I have found fencing to be very safe however I would still like peace of mind while bouting.
What is the difference between 350N and 1600N? Also, which is better, masks by Leon Paul or Uhlmann? are they the same or is there a difference considering I can obtain Uhlmann masks for $40 cheaper? Which company is more reputable among fencers?
Thankyou. I would appreciate any comments as I am still very new to the technicalities of fencing equipment. |
| | | And now for this message... | |
08-06-2004, 03:50 AM
|
#2 | | Curmudgeon-in-Chief
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Somewhere in your nightmares!
Posts: 23,192
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by capa What is the difference between 350N and 1600N? | 1250 Newtons...
Just kidding. The 1600N mask is more resistant to puncture, at least theoretically. So the mesh is stronger. Quote: |
Also, which is better, masks by Leon Paul or Uhlmann? are they the same or is there a difference considering I can obtain Uhlmann masks for $40 cheaper? Which company is more reputable among fencers?
| They are equivalent in terms of safety and durability, and both companies are fine to deal with. I haven't worn an LP, but I understand that they have fit and design features which some people prefer to those of Allstar/Uhlmann. I have always used Allstar ( same company as Uhlmann ) and like them fine. Absent specific preference you might as well decide by price...
But----is it impact resistance, ie cushioning, you're looking for, given your eye situation? The LP may be somewhat better in that regard, though again that's only what I hear... |
| |
08-06-2004, 05:06 AM
|
#3 | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,564
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by capa Hi,
What is the difference between 350N and 1600N? Also, which is better, masks by Leon Paul or Uhlmann? are they the same or is there a difference considering I can obtain Uhlmann masks for $40 cheaper? Which company is more reputable among fencers? | Neither is more reputable really.
I use the new LP comfort fit (1600N) mask. The comfort fit system makes a big difference in my opinion. Less weight. More comfortable. But it is really down to personal preference. If you have the opportunity ask around at your club and try on various peoples masks ( before they fence) and see which you like best. |
| |
08-06-2004, 11:20 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 1,218
| Consider this:
350 newton = 35.7 kilogram-force = 78.7 pound-force
1600 newton = 163.1 kilogram-force = 359.7 pound-force
And the mask test punch fails a mask @ 12 Kg, but that is a measurement of the mesh's ability to stay in place and not deform laterally as to make the openings wider.
A 1600 N mask will have a superior bib, which is of more concern to me than the mesh (for some reason, I dunno why)
Also I think the FIE masks use Stainless steel mesh which will hold up better in the long run. |
| |
08-06-2004, 01:21 PM
|
#5 | | Armorer
Join Date: Jan 2000 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,624
| The "1600 N" designation refers to an FIE Homolgated mask (also CE Level 2, which means the same thing). 350 N is the CE Level 1 standard for fencing equipment. The FIE Homologation requires a 1600 Newton-resistant bib (as rated by the dynometer spec'd in the FIE rules). There are also requirements that the mesh be of stainless steel and meet certain manufacturing standards which aren't enforced for non-FIE masks.
Executive summary: FIE masks will afford a generally superior level of protection both from the mesh and the bib. The Leon Paul contour fit system is very nice (I have one), and the LP FIE mask with it is very comfortable and well-made. If you're comparing a mask bought direct from LP and an Uhlmann mask though a vendor, the extra middleman will account for the price difference.
-Dave
__________________
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by."
-Douglas Adams
|
| |
08-13-2004, 01:36 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: TX en route to KY
Posts: 1,357
| My personal opinion is that you should go with the 1600N (FIE) mask. This is your head, and consequently, your life. Its worth protecting.
I am somewhat biased, I admit. Early on in my epee career, I got hit in the mask all the time. I'd sit on the floor once a week with a ballpene (sp?) hammer, pounding out the dents. I later bought a new 350N mask, and the first time I ever fenced with it, in the first bout, and the first point, a foil hit my lamee, snapped, and rammed into my mask. It sheered off the top half of the mesh where it hit, and didn't pass the punch test after that. Imaginging if it hadn't held... I decided I didn't want to buy any more 350N masks, because not only was the 1600N mask safer, I wasn't too keen on having to replace a mask again because it didn't pass a punch test.
Uhlmann or Leon Paul? Both have good reputations. I prefer Uhlmann to Leon Paul in most equipment (I like LP's knickers) but I have something of a bias, having used poorly maintained LP equipment, and well maintained Uhlmann equipment. I SUSPECT that the masks will fit differently, and it will be a matter of preference. Try to try them on, if at all possible.
But you really can't go wrong with either one. Good luck,.
(and geez was that a long post!) |
| |
08-13-2004, 01:50 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 553
| There is a bit of confusion regarding so called 350 Newton and 1600 Newton masks. The european standards which the F.I.E, now follow for F.I.E. equipment has two levels of performance 1 and 2. The performance level 1 must have a bib which withstands high velocity probe at greater than 350 Newtons and a hard shell (Mesh or plactic) which withstands 600 Newton at low velocity and 5.5J impact test all these measured under set conditions Level 2 (F.I.E.level) the figures are 1600 Newtons 1000 Newtons and 8.5 J. I hope this is now clear. Barry Paul |
| |
08-17-2004, 10:14 AM
|
#8 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Australia
Posts: 39
| Thanks everyone for your reply. I have purchased the Uhlmann 1600N mask. I'm still waiting for the product to be delivered so am hoping I made the right choice.
Your posts were very helpful. Thankyou  |
| |
08-17-2004, 02:35 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: TX en route to KY
Posts: 1,357
| Capa- if its any consolation (well, you don't need consolation, but...), I've got the Uhlmann 1600N mask. I like it, hope you like yours! (And did you decide to go with the washable removable pading? Also nice.) |
| |
08-17-2004, 03:39 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 1,218
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by capa Thanks everyone for your reply. I have purchased the Uhlmann 1600N mask. I'm still waiting for the product to be delivered so am hoping I made the right choice.
Your posts were very helpful. Thankyou  | Its a good choice. My previous mask was a Triplette FIE 1600 N (although there's some debate as to its certification) and I now have the Uhlmann 1600. The mesh of the Triplette dented WAY more easily than the Uhlmann, which has not been dented yet, despite a couple good chin-knockers I've taken wearing it. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM. |